Electoral College Debate Heads To Washington State Supreme Court Over ‘Hamilton Elector’ Challenge
Three Washington Democrats will tell the state Supreme Court on Tuesday why they voted against their party’s presidential nominee in the 2016 election.
The three, Levi Guerra, Esther V. John and Peter B. Chiafalo, were among 12 Democrats the state sent to the Electoral College.
Candidate Hillary Clinton won the nomination from Washington Democrats in 2016, but the three electors refused to vote for her. Their refusal was part of a larger plan to foil Donald Trump’s nomination.
The state fined them $1,000 each for violating their party’s rules.
Their attorney, Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig, is asking the court to overturn the fines and allow electors to vote as they choose.
“We think it’s pretty clear, under the Constitution, that Washington’s not allowed to do that because these electors, though selected/appointed by Washington, are actually acting to perform a federal function and can’t be controlled by a state,” Lessig said.
He said the state doesn’t have authority to tell electors who to vote for.
“There have been about 167 electors in the course of American history who have deviated from how they were expected to vote,” he said, “and Washington state is the first state in the history of the nation to fine electors.”
The state maintains that electors must follow their party’s choice and face fines if they refuse to. Assistant Attorney General Callie Castillo will argue the case for Washington’s Secretary of State’s Office.
Instead of casting votes for Clinton, electoral college members Guerra, John and Chiafalo voted for former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell. The effort was part of the failed “Hamilton Electors” movement that sought to deny Donald Trump the presidency, by persuading electors to vote for other Republicans, instead.
A related hearing is also scheduled in Colorado this week.
Lessig said the cases should be decided by 2020 to prevent confusion over whether electors can pick their own candidate. The case could eventually end up the U.S. Supreme Court.
Copyright 2019 KUOW
Russia’s information attack against the United States during the 2016 election cycle sought to take advantage of the greater trust that Americans tend to place in local news. The information operatives who worked out of the Internet Research Agency in St. Petersburg did not stop at posing as American social media users or spreading false information from purported news sources, according to new details. Continue Reading ‘Seattle Post’? Not A Thing. Russia Sought To Exploit Trust In Local News During 2016 Campaign
Republican Jinyoung Lee Englund, left, and Democrat Manka Dhingra, right, are vying for the 45th legislative district Senate seat. Dhingra leads in early results. CAMPAIGN… Continue Reading Democrat Takes Early Lead In Race For Control Of Washington State Senate
Olympia State Capitol Building TED S. WARREN / ASSOCIATED PRESS Listen Democrats are declaring victory in a special Washington state Senate race that will give… Continue Reading Democrats Declare Victory In Washington 45th District Race, Capture One-Party Control Of Olympia