Electoral College Debate Heads To Washington State Supreme Court Over ‘Hamilton Elector’ Challenge
Three Washington Democrats will tell the state Supreme Court on Tuesday why they voted against their party’s presidential nominee in the 2016 election.
The three, Levi Guerra, Esther V. John and Peter B. Chiafalo, were among 12 Democrats the state sent to the Electoral College.
Candidate Hillary Clinton won the nomination from Washington Democrats in 2016, but the three electors refused to vote for her. Their refusal was part of a larger plan to foil Donald Trump’s nomination.
The state fined them $1,000 each for violating their party’s rules.
Their attorney, Harvard professor Lawrence Lessig, is asking the court to overturn the fines and allow electors to vote as they choose.
“We think it’s pretty clear, under the Constitution, that Washington’s not allowed to do that because these electors, though selected/appointed by Washington, are actually acting to perform a federal function and can’t be controlled by a state,” Lessig said.
He said the state doesn’t have authority to tell electors who to vote for.
“There have been about 167 electors in the course of American history who have deviated from how they were expected to vote,” he said, “and Washington state is the first state in the history of the nation to fine electors.”
The state maintains that electors must follow their party’s choice and face fines if they refuse to. Assistant Attorney General Callie Castillo will argue the case for Washington’s Secretary of State’s Office.
Instead of casting votes for Clinton, electoral college members Guerra, John and Chiafalo voted for former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell. The effort was part of the failed “Hamilton Electors” movement that sought to deny Donald Trump the presidency, by persuading electors to vote for other Republicans, instead.
A related hearing is also scheduled in Colorado this week.
Lessig said the cases should be decided by 2020 to prevent confusion over whether electors can pick their own candidate. The case could eventually end up the U.S. Supreme Court.
Copyright 2019 KUOW
U.S. intelligence agencies reported Russian, Chinese and Iranian influence activities targeting last year’s midterms, and a senior FBI official last week singled out Beijing as a particular source of concern. Continue Reading Experts Warn: Threats To 2020 U.S. Election Not Limited To Russia
Bernie Sanders easily won the 2016 Washington caucus against Hillary Clinton, but the state’s shift to a primary presents a challenge for his campaign: converting the passionate caucus support he enjoyed in the last election to broader turnout in 2020. Continue Reading Washington’s Changed Presidential Primary Means New Strategy For Candidates Like Bernie Sanders
Special counsel Robert Mueller stepped down Wednesday after concluding Donald Trump didn’t conspire with Russia’s interference in the 2016 election — but also detailing what critics called a range of troubling conduct. Continue Reading Special Counsel Robert Mueller Makes Closing Statement, Steps Down After Leading Russia Inquiry