Washington Initiative Activist Tim Eyman Demands Public Vote On Police Deadly Force Law Change

Initiative activist Tim Eyman, left, delivered a copy of his lawsuit to the Secretary of State's office in Olympia Monday. TOM BANSE / NORTHWEST NEWS NETWORK


On the final day of the Washington legislative session last week, lawmakers passed a bill to make it easier to prosecute police for negligent shootings. It was a compromise agreed to by groups on all sides to keep a potentially divisive initiative off the November ballot.

Now professional initiative sponsor Tim Eyman, who wasn’t previously involved on this issue, filed a lawsuit Monday that argues the legislature wrongly denied the voters a say.

“What we’re going to the judge to say is the issue is irrelevant,” Eyman said. “The process is what I want you to focus on. Is it the right thing they did in the process?”

In his lawsuit, Eyman asks the Thurston County Superior Court to order Secretary of State Kim Wyman to place Initiative 940 on the ballot alongside the legislature’s partial rewrite of the measure.

A state representative involved in negotiating the police charging compromise said the amending process that lawmakers chose is permitted by the state constitution.

“It clearly complies with what the constitution allows,” said state Rep. Roger Goodman in an interview Monday. “We reached a historic agreement between police and aggrieved communities. It’s a big win.”

The sponsors of the police deadly use of force initiative said they are reviewing the lawsuit and declined immediate comment.

In December, the De-Escalate Washington campaign turned in 359,000 signatures to qualify the measure for consideration.

I-940 was an Initiative to the Legislature. Under the state constitution, lawmakers can approve such a measure as is, in which case it promptly becomes law. They can reject or ignore the measure, which automatically sends it to the November ballot. Or they can propose an alternative to appear alongside the original on the November ballot.

In this instance, Eyman said the Legislature created a fourth option: It passed the original initiative and then immediately amended it.

Republicans in the state Senate questioned the constitutionality of the process during floor debate last Thursday. Eyman quoted from the debate in his legal filing.

De-Escalate Washington contended that it is nearly impossible under current state law to criminally charge police officers who negligently use deadly force. Relatives and allies of people who died in confrontations with police wrote I-940 to allow prosecutors to charge a police officer after a deadly shooting using a new “good faith” standard. The initiative also called for ongoing de-escalation and mental health training for officers.

The compromise the state legislature subsequently passed re-worked the charging standard again to remove a “malice” test and define good faith based on whether a “similarly situated reasonable officer” would have used deadly force.

Goodman, the chair of the House Public Safety Committee, said the legislative rewrite only addressed a few of the provisions of I-940 and therefore should not be presented to voters as an alternative.

“It’d be kind of confusing for the voters,” Goodman said.

“If any ruling were to impact what appears on the November General Election ballot, Secretary Wyman encourages the court to rule quickly so the case can be fully resolved before Washington’s 39 counties have to print voter pamphlets and ballots for the election,” Wyman’s spokesman Erich Ebel wrote in an emailed statement.

Eyman, who is acting as his own attorney although he is not a lawyer, said he expects a first hearing on the case before a judge next month. He argued in his complaint filed with the court that he has legal standing to bring the case simply by being a voter and taxpayer.

Eyman has some familiarity with the Thurston County Superior Court because he is a defendant there in a long-running campaign finance case which alleges improper personal use of contributions to a political committee. Last Thursday, a judge found Eyman in contempt of court for withholding records needed to proceed with the case. The judge set a daily fine of $250 per day until the contempt is purged.

Eyman on Monday deflected questions about that case, which the state Attorney General’s office is litigating against him.

Copyright 2018 Northwest News Network

Related Stories:

Professional initiative sponsor Tim Eyman, right, holds a photo from his first successful $30 car tabs initiative in 1999. Eyman says he has collected almost enough signatures to qualify a 2019 car tabs rollback initiative to the 2019 Legislature. CREDIT: AUSTIN JENKINS/N3

Washington Supreme Court Unanimously Strikes Down I-976, Tim Eyman’s $30 Car Tab Initiative

On Thursday, the state Supreme Court struck down Initiative 976, a measure Washington voters approved last November to reduce the cost of annual vehicle licensing fees. The measure has been on hold for nearly a year as legal challenges worked their way through the court system. Continue Reading Washington Supreme Court Unanimously Strikes Down I-976, Tim Eyman’s $30 Car Tab Initiative

Read More »
In-person signature gathering efforts from Reclaim Idaho were put on ice during the coronavirus pandemic. CREDIT: Reclaim Idaho via Facebook

U.S. Supreme Court Halts Online Signature Drive To Get Education Funding Measure On Idaho Ballot

The U.S. Supreme Court has put a halt to the Reclaim Idaho K-12 initiative drive. Thursday’s ruling represents a legal victory for Gov. Brad Little and Secretary of State Lawerence Denney, who requested a stay of a lower court ruling allowing Reclaim Idaho to gather online signatures for its “Invest in Idaho” initiative. Continue Reading U.S. Supreme Court Halts Online Signature Drive To Get Education Funding Measure On Idaho Ballot

Read More »