Grizzly Bear Meetings Bring Out Ranchers, Conservationists
Would you like to see more grizzly bears in Washington’s North Cascades? That’s what the federal government is asking during informational meetings across the state. A plan is in the works to consider adding more grizzlies to Washington’s dwindling population.
Okanogan is a small town nestled in the foothills of Washington’s North Cascade mountains. It’s surrounded by rangeland, apple orchards, and hiking trails. Ranches and homesteads butt up to the Okanogan National Forest and other public lands.
One of those properties is owned by Bill Bruton. He and his wife have spent the past 15 years living in a cabin in the woods of Okanogan County.
Bruton worried about his grandkids out hiking. And his rancher friends’ cattle — should more bears return to this area.
“I don’t know what good these meetings do because we keep on going to meetings and meetings, and nothing ever goes our way,” Bruton said.
Emotions ran high at the recent Grizzly bear open house Bruton attended. But it was nothing like the meeting held there 22 years ago.
Back in 1993, ranchers and townspeople raised their voices when the federal government asked what they thought about bringing grizzly bears into their backyards. Spit flew in the faces of officials during the infamous meeting.
No one left happy.
Flash forward to the current round of meetings in the North Cascades. People still aren’t happy. At the Okanogan open house, residents chimed in: Keep the bears in Alaska. Canada. Don’t bring “another predator” here.
Biologists were on hand to answer Bruton’s questions. Some were there 20 years ago. Like meeting an old adversary in battle — people still stuck to their guns.
One man who attended both meetings was Chris Servheen . He studied grizzlies his entire career with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. He was on the ground team to start grizzly recovery efforts back in the early ‘80s.
“It’s good to get started on some efforts here in the North Cascades because these bears need a lot of help,” Servheen said.
It’s been during Servheen’s career that the endangered bears have built sustainable populations in Yellowstone and Glacier national parks.
He’s also helped reintroduce grizzly bears in northwest Montana — where people were just as upset about the idea as they were in Okanogan.
In the early 1990s, Biologists brought in 14 bears to a grizzly recovery zone in that part of Montana.
Servheen said since then none of the bears have attacked people or livestock. The population has increased to 45 grizzlies.
In Washington’s North Cascades grizzly bear numbers are so few that no one has reported spotting one since 1996 in Washington.
Biologists said it will take up to a century before grizzlies reach a sustainable population in the North Cascades. That’s because they live a long time and don’t have cubs until they’re pretty old.
Servheen said that means his great-grandchildren could see a recovered grizzly bear population in these mountains. That would mean about 200 bears.
“That’s why we do this, so that future generations have something to see,” Servheen said. “Grizzly bears occupy about four percent of their former range in the lower 48. We don’t want to relegate them to Canada and Alaska.”
Joe Scott is with Conservation Northwest. He said having grizzlies in an area means the ecosystem is healthy.
“They’re one of the missing pieces of the ecological puzzle of the Cascades,” Scott said. “And we’re responsible for its disappearance from the landscape, and we should be responsible for helping it return.”
The federal government hasn’t officially proposed any options. That will come next summer. Right now, options could range from bringing in grizzly from more healthy populations to doing nothing.
Although Chris Servheen said that’s not really going to work.
“Such a small population is going to eventually go extinct without some assistance,” he said.
It’s not only ranchers who are concerned. Hiking and climbing groups said they want to make sure the forests and mountains stay safe for recreation.
Servheen said it’s all a matter of taking precautions: hanging packs, wearing bells. He said bears don’t want to run into people any more than people want to run into them.
Grizzly bear meetings continue this week:
Cle Elum, 5-7:30 p.m., Monday, Putnum Centennial Center Meeting Room
Seattle, 5-7:30 p.m., Tuesday, Seattle Pacific University Bertona Classroom 1
Bellingham, 5-7:30 p.m., Wednesday, Bellingham Central Library Lecture Room
Copyright 2015 Northwest Public Broadcasting
One of the habitat designations is specifically for Southern Resident Killer Whales, which spend about half the year in the Salish Sea north of Seattle. They feed on salmon. There are fewer than 80 of these orcas remaining. Continue Reading Federal Managers Propose Northwest Habitat Protections For Orcas And Humpback Whales
Washington state wildlife officials are asking that you slow down, don’t drive distracted, use your high beams when you can, and brake a little longer if you see just one deer, since often more deer will follow. Continue Reading Oh, Deer! Washington Wildlife Officials Warn Of Increased Vehicle Collisions During Mating Season
Over at least two decades, Washington business owner Tod Reichert spent hundreds of thousands of dollars buying exclusive hunting licenses he used to kill more than 100 elk. His license for the Ellensburg hunt, a “governor’s tag” auctioned to fund elk-related conservation efforts by state wildlife managers, cost him $50,000. Continue Reading He Spent $50K On A Tag To Kill A Noted Kittitas Valley Elk. What’s The Real Cost Of Trophy Hunts?