
Should Washington State Establish An Online Consumer Bill Of Rights?
Listen
Washington State Chief Privacy Officer Alex Alben thinks it’s time for an online consumer bill of rights. He discussed the idea Thursday on TVW’s “Inside Olympia” program.
Alben is a Stanford-educated lawyer who worked for Starwave and RealNetworks before becoming Washington’s first chief privacy officer in 2015. He said the time has come to give online consumers new protections that go beyond the state’s 56-year-old Consumer Protection Act.
“Way beyond the Consumer Protection Act,” Alben said. “That act is a great act. It’s a pre-internet act.”
Alben envisions a new consumer bill of rights specifically to protect digital or online privacy. He said one element of this new law should be something called “consent in context”—an idea that’s catching fire in Europe.
“If you’re going to use my data for a purpose that I didn’t know about or I didn’t think about, you have to come back to me and then say ‘I want to use this data in another way, do I have your consent?’” Alben said.
He believes Washington state should press forward with new consumer protections in the absence of action at the federal level.
Alben noted that in 2012 then-President Barack Obama proposed a privacy bill of rights, but it was criticized by both industry and privacy advocates and didn’t pass Congress.
Then earlier this year Congress repealed FCC rules designed to prevent internet providers from selling information without consumer approval.
In response, a large, bipartisan group of lawmakers in both the Washington House and Senate introduced legislation to re-impose those rules at the state level. The measure passed the Democratically-controlled House, but didn’t get a hearing in the Republican-controlled Senate. The bills would have required broadband internet providers to get permission before selling an individual’s internet browsing history for commercial purposes.
Washington lawmakers could still adopt an internet privacy law as part of a final budget deal.
Two new privacy protections did pass the Washington Legislature this year and were signed into law by Gov. Jay Inslee. Both deal with biometric identifiers like fingerprints, iris scans, facial recognition and voiceprint.
One prohibits private companies from selling or disclosing biometric data without consent. The other prohibits state government agencies from collecting biometric data without consent, unless it’s for law enforcement purposes.
Alben spoke with Austin Jenkins on TVW’s “Inside Olympia” program.
9(MDEwMDE0NjgyMDEzNDY0NDY5NTBmNTc1Yg004))
Related Stories:

The president just unraveled years of work on tribal rights, salmon and clean energy. So what happens next?
Less than two years ago, the administration of President Joe Biden announced what tribal leaders hailed as an unprecedented commitment to the Native tribes whose ways of life had been devastated by federal dam-building along the Columbia River in the Pacific Northwest.
The deal, which took two years to negotiate, halted decades of lawsuits over the harm federal dams had caused to the salmon that had sustained those tribes culturally and economically for thousands of years. To enable the removal of four hydroelectric dams considered especially harmful to salmon, the government promised to invest billions of dollars in alternative energy sources to be created by the tribes.
This story comes to you from Oregon Public Broadcasting and the Northwest News Network, a collaboration between public media organizations in Oregon and Washington.

Scientists band burrowing owls to help research around the world
“The amount of information that comes out of this colony is unprecedented. It’s amazing. It has contributed to nine different topics of discovery for the whole species. So, it’s pretty incredible.”

Wenatchee Valley businesses collect cash donations in memory of Decker sisters
Cash donations were raised by local businesses in the Wenatchee Valley to help support the mother of the three Decker girls.