Jay Inslee Calls On State Wildlife Agency To ‘Significantly Reduce’ Lethal Wolf Actions

Wolves on a trail camera near Republic, Wash., in Ferry County. Courtesy of University of Washington
Wolves on a trail camera near Republic, Wash., in Ferry County. Courtesy of University of Washington

READ ON

Washington Gov. Jay Inslee is asking state wildlife officials to “significantly reduce” the killing of wolves involved in livestock conflicts.

In a letter to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Director Kelly Susewind, Inslee asked that the state increase efforts to change guidelines that dictate when a wolf can be lethally removed.

“We must find new methods to better support the coexistence between Washington’s livestock industry and gray wolves in our state. The status quo of annual lethal removal is simply unacceptable,” Inslee wrote.

MORE: Washington Wolf Managers Seek Online Feedback On Wolves During Webinars. Information Here

Right now, the state can lethally remove wolves after they’ve repeatedly killed livestock. The department says this is an attempt to change pack behavior. They must confirm at least three wolf depredations from the pack on livestock within 30 days or four within 10 months.

Livestock owners have to show that they’ve tried other methods to keep wolves away, such as deploying range riders, using lights or noise to scare wolves, or bright flags with electric fencing.

In his letter, Inslee asked the department to increase these types of non-lethal measures and to work with public land managers to change “allotment policies for public lands that are prime wolf habitat.”

In particular, Inslee called out actions taken in the Kettle Mountain Range in Ferry County, where many of the wolves are concentrated in northeastern Washington. Wolf-livestock conflict has proven controversial in the area, where the majority of wolves in the state are located.

Inslee wrote that management actions have “resulted in public concern and outrage.”

Last June, the Center for Biological Diversity, sent a letter to Inslee asking that he revise the way the state manages wolf-livestock conflicts.

Earlier this summer, four wolves in the Old Profanity Territory pack were killed in northeastern Washington, hours before a court hearing was to decide their fate.

In August, WDFW’s Kelly Susewind authorized the lethal removal of the two remaining wolves in the Togo pack. Neither wolf had been killed as of Sept. 27.

Most recently, Susewind authorized the incremental lethal removal of the Grouse Flats pack in southeastern Washington. The lethal removal will be evaluated after a certain time to see if the pack’s behavior has changed.

In an emailed statement, Conservation Northwest Executive Director Mitch Friedman said there is more work needed in northeastern Washington’s Kettle Mountain Range. The group works with some livestock producers in the region.

“Incidents of wolf lethal removal remain very low in Washington compared to other states even as our wolf population continues to grow and expand its range,” Friedman said.

Defenders of Wildlife applauded the governor for “pushing back against the status quo,” urging the state to act quickly.

“We can’t turn a blind eye to avoidable conflicts that lead to the continued lethal removal of wolves and expect a different result,” said Quinn Read, northwest program director for Defenders of Wildlife.

Wolves are protected under state rules in the eastern third of Washington. They are protected under the federal endangered species list in the western two-thirds of the state.

Since 2008, Washington’s wolf population has grown by 28 percent each year, according to the Department of Fish and Wildlife. Most recent counts show there are at least 126 individual wolves, which includes wolves in packs and those out looking for a mate. The individual wolves make up at least 27 packs and 15 successful breeding pairs in the state.

Inslee had previously opposed the Trump administration’s plan to remove gray wolves from the federal endangered species list. That view also broke from Susewind’s opinion. He previously called the decision to federally delist the gray wolves “appropriate and timely.”

The state is developing a gray wolf post-recovery plan to figure out how to manage wolves once they are federally delisted. The last webinar to provide information about the topic is at 6 p.m. Tuesday, Oct. 15.

Courtney Flatt covers environmental and natural resource issues for Northwest Public Broadcasting. She is based in Washington’s Tri-Cities. On Twitter: @courtneyflatt

Related Stories:

The Calistoga Reach Levee Set Back in Pierce County is an engineered levee set back to help the river flow in a more natural way. The project was part of a larger Floodplains by Design grant. // Courtesy the Washington State Department of Ecology

Rethinking levees to reduce flood risk

Washington Rep. Steve Tharinger of the 24th district became intimately acquainted with levee setbacks when he discovered the levee protecting his house on the lower Dungeness River was not only not protecting his house, but harming the ecosystem too.
“I sold my house and the five acres in a barn we had, so that we’d have more room to move that levee back and give the river more room,” Tharinger said. Continue Reading Rethinking levees to reduce flood risk

A woman and her baby are pictured in front a blurred forest scene near sunset. She's smiling toward the camera. She has shoulder-length brown hair that's parted in the center and is wearing a grey sweater. Her baby looks toward the right and has chubby cheeks and is wearing a red and black plaid long-sleeve top and blue jeans.

‘It happened exactly the way we all had feared’: Idaho women sue state for failure to protect patients with pregnancies that threatened life and health

An Idaho woman worried a year ago what might happen to her family if she needed an abortion after the state’s ban took effect. That fear came true. Now, the Caldwell woman is suing. Continue Reading ‘It happened exactly the way we all had feared’: Idaho women sue state for failure to protect patients with pregnancies that threatened life and health