Trump Administration Proposes Changes To Limit Endangered Species Act
Listen
The Trump administration is proposing key changes to the Endangered Species Act. It’s a move conservation groups say could greatly weaken the way animals and plants are protected.
The changes could limit how critical habitat is designated. It would also rollback the protections for threatened species. Instead of extending automatic protections to threatened species, those kinds of decisions would be made on a case-by-case basis.
Federal officials say the changes would simplify the 45-year-old act and make regulations more predictable.
“Together these rules will be very protective and enhance the conservation of the species — we maintain all of the legal standards of the act. At the same time, we hope that (the rules) ameliorate some of the unnecessary burden, conflict and uncertainty that is within our current regulatory structure,” said David Bernhardt, deputy secretary for the Interior Department.
The proposed changes would also streamline how other federal agencies identify whether they are harming a protected species. The draft changes also define key terms that have caused conflict in the past, in court cases or for other agencies.
Conservation groups say these rule changes could be detrimental to the bedrock environmental rule and cause great harm to imperiled species. Brett Hartl, government affairs director for the Center for Biological Diversity, said these new regulations make the Endangered Species Act “more industry friendly and more wildlife unfriendly.”
“It’s going to make it much harder to save (endangered species),” Hartl said. “It’s like, ‘We’re going to make it as hard as possible and put every obstacle in front of you, poor little critter, for you to get off our Endangered Species List.’”
Most concerning, Hartl said, were the proposed limitations to critical habitat designations, which would favor areas where species are at the time of listing and give less weight to historical ranges, or unoccupied areas, which Hartl said is important when trying to save imperiled species.
“This approach basically just says, ‘To hell with unoccupied areas. You’re going to have to make do with what you got,’” Hartl said.
The proposed changes come after an executive order called for all federal agencies to streamline regulations. The proposal also comes as some Republican lawmakers are pushing for changes to the Endangered Species Act.
Related Stories:
Conservationists Worry As U.S. House Votes To End Wolf Protections, Senate to Consider
The U.S. House passed a bill Friday that would end federal protections for gray wolves in the Lower 48 states. For wolves in the Northwest, that would mean protections fall to state agencies. Continue Reading Conservationists Worry As U.S. House Votes To End Wolf Protections, Senate to Consider
Washington’s Pikas Are In Even More Trouble Than Scientists Thought
Pikas like it cold, so, as the climate has warmed, they’ve disappeared from lower elevations where they used to live. For years, scientists thought pikas were adapting to climate change by moving uphill. But new research indicates the news is even worse than that. Continue Reading Washington’s Pikas Are In Even More Trouble Than Scientists Thought
Gray Wolves Could Lose Protections As ‘Endangered’ Status Reconsidered
The federal government is reviewing the endangered species status of gray wolves in the Lower 48 states — a move that could lead to reduced protections. This includes the western parts of Oregon and Washington, where wolves are considered endangered under U.S. law. Continue Reading Gray Wolves Could Lose Protections As ‘Endangered’ Status Reconsidered
