Trump Administration Proposes Changes To Limit Endangered Species Act
Listen
The Trump administration is proposing key changes to the Endangered Species Act. It’s a move conservation groups say could greatly weaken the way animals and plants are protected.
The changes could limit how critical habitat is designated. It would also rollback the protections for threatened species. Instead of extending automatic protections to threatened species, those kinds of decisions would be made on a case-by-case basis.
Federal officials say the changes would simplify the 45-year-old act and make regulations more predictable.
“Together these rules will be very protective and enhance the conservation of the species — we maintain all of the legal standards of the act. At the same time, we hope that (the rules) ameliorate some of the unnecessary burden, conflict and uncertainty that is within our current regulatory structure,” said David Bernhardt, deputy secretary for the Interior Department.
The proposed changes would also streamline how other federal agencies identify whether they are harming a protected species. The draft changes also define key terms that have caused conflict in the past, in court cases or for other agencies.
Conservation groups say these rule changes could be detrimental to the bedrock environmental rule and cause great harm to imperiled species. Brett Hartl, government affairs director for the Center for Biological Diversity, said these new regulations make the Endangered Species Act “more industry friendly and more wildlife unfriendly.”
“It’s going to make it much harder to save (endangered species),” Hartl said. “It’s like, ‘We’re going to make it as hard as possible and put every obstacle in front of you, poor little critter, for you to get off our Endangered Species List.’”
Most concerning, Hartl said, were the proposed limitations to critical habitat designations, which would favor areas where species are at the time of listing and give less weight to historical ranges, or unoccupied areas, which Hartl said is important when trying to save imperiled species.
“This approach basically just says, ‘To hell with unoccupied areas. You’re going to have to make do with what you got,’” Hartl said.
The proposed changes come after an executive order called for all federal agencies to streamline regulations. The proposal also comes as some Republican lawmakers are pushing for changes to the Endangered Species Act.
Related Stories:
‘It Sometimes Is Depressing’: Conservation Moves Forward, And Uphill, For Washington’s Sage Grouse
Sage grouse in the Columbia Basin are cut off from others in Oregon and southern Idaho, making them unique in their recovery. In 1998, Washington listed its sage grouse as threatened. They now occupy around 8 percent of their historic range in the state. Continue Reading ‘It Sometimes Is Depressing’: Conservation Moves Forward, And Uphill, For Washington’s Sage Grouse
Endangered Species Status Of Northern Spotted Owl Will Remain Unchanged
The U.S Fish and Wildlife Service ruled against upgrading the iconic Northern spotted owl’s protection status Monday under the Endangered Species Act. Continue Reading Endangered Species Status Of Northern Spotted Owl Will Remain Unchanged
Where Have All The Wolverines Gone? Apparently Not On The Endangered Species List (Yet)
Conservation groups say the animals need to be listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Ten groups want to force the federal government to protect the elusive wolverines. The groups estimate there are around 300 wolverines left, sparsely scattered across the Mountain West, including Idaho, Washington and Oregon. Continue Reading Where Have All The Wolverines Gone? Apparently Not On The Endangered Species List (Yet)
